G. K. CHESTERTON THE OUTLINE OF SANITY New York DODD, MEAD .. But it is strange that some of us should have seen sanity, if only in a vision, while. The Outline of Sanity has ratings and 20 reviews. G.R. said: This book certainly makes you stop and ponder; even more so when you realise that not mu . 2 quotes from The Outline of Sanity: ‘A pickpocket is obviously a champion of private enterprise. But it would perhaps be an exaggeration to say that a p.
|Country:||Trinidad & Tobago|
|Published (Last):||19 March 2010|
|PDF File Size:||3.1 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He favored distribution of wealth while being antisocialist; he advocated ownership of private property while being anticapitalist. That doesn’t mean he was a bad writer; his style just takes a lot of extra thought and work.
The Outline of Sanity Quotes
Though there are some jewels of passages throughout. Robert rated it it was amazing Feb 02, Want to Read Currently Reading Read. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. I admire his dexterity with words, but I think ouyline wordplay distracted from his line of thought. Aug 07, Vicki rated it really liked it. I really enjoyed some of the ideas of distributism, but most of the book seemed to ramble on and on.
He wants people to approach the project with a sacramental, quasi-religious mindset.
Catherine rated it it was amazing Feb 25, As Dale Ahlquist explains:. Feb 25, Pat Miller rated it did not like it.
The Distributist state is largely static, and so would be anathema to those who, for reasons that I have never quite been able to fathom, believe that the economy must grow every quarter, month, week, and day of the year. Home Contact Us Help Free delivery worldwide. Our reading for our next meeting will be Chesterton’s distributist tome, The Outline of Sanity. Danny Biles rated it really liked it May 12, Apr 25, Lance rated it it was amazing.
I love Chesterton, but economics was not his forte. Chesterton states that men easily accept despotism and slavery. This book is a summation of an ongoing series of debates that Chesterton engaged in with a range of Capitalists and Socialists on the question of a proposed third alte Although Chesterton wrote this book in the early twentieth century, it remains just as relevant today in a world where we continue to see massive consolidation, corporations too big to fail, relentless standardization of the products that shape our lives, and the increasing machine mentality to make the so called medicine go down.
A powerful and intrusive state would be required to maintain the status quo, and this is incompatible with the Distributist idea. Livro recomendado principalmente a quem estuda a Doutrina Social da Igreja. Apr 18, J.
“The Outline of Sanity”
Instead, he recommeds Distributism: Chels S rated it sanuty was amazing May 20, But there are signs here and there that something like Distributism might be gaining some traction. This resemblance gave Chesterton a clever riposte to the ojtline that Distributism is an impossible ideal: This was the third book of the the Mumford and Sons bookclub!
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. We live in broken society and it is ruled by two very broken, narrow social philosophies that seem to be at war with one another when they are in fact co-conspirators against the common man: Sep 03, Steve rated it it was amazing.
Goodreads is the world’s largest site for readers with over 50 million reviews.
Chesterton: The Outline of Sanity | All Manner of Thing
Entries and comments feeds. Had I not been reading on my Kindle I would’ve thrown it against the wall! Chesterton’s usual bombast is freighted a little bit in this one in that he has to keep edging back to particulars: Books Great moments in opera: In that sense I suppose it has lost.
Can you make it? Want to Read saving…. All of this is to say that the economic state of affairs proposed by Distributism is vastly different in many respects from the current state of affairs.
Email Address never made public. As he said, “Action ought to have been taken long ago, but action can still be taken now You obviously understand these things much better than me.