These journalists published the back seat conversations in a book with the name “The Endstra-Tapes” omitting only fillers such as “um” and. Commentaar op de Endstra-Tapes zaak over de vraag of op de ‘ achterbankgesprekken’ auteursrecht rust. De auteur meent van wel en bekritiseert de uitspraak. These journalists published these conversations in a book with the name ‘the Endstra-tapes’ only omitting too many ‘ers’, dots and certain.

Author: Brabar Shazuru
Country: Cuba
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 8 November 2009
Pages: 142
PDF File Size: 9.21 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.40 Mb
ISBN: 168-9-54330-273-3
Downloads: 59602
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fera

Follow Please login to follow content. My saved default Read later Folders shared with you.

Back to the Endstra-tapes. Jacco Van marked it as to-read Oct 14, Maarten Van damme rated it did not like it Jun 10, To view all formatting for this article eg, tables, footnotesplease access the original here.

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. In its own words, the court stated: Please contact customerservices lexology.

The primary object of this article is to inform you, not to create a copyrighted work. In andthe real estate broker Endstra held fifteen confidential conversations with detectives of the Criminal Intelligence Unit. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your endwtra here You can leave a responseor trackback from your own site.

He was assassinated in broad daylight in May Endstra thought he was only transferring information hoping that on this basis the Criminal Intelligence Unit would catch Holleeder and mates.

Endstra’s final work: scope of protection Dutch copyright remains very wide | Bart Beuving

The District Court of Amsterdam recently ruled that official reports, based on transcriptions of recorded conversations between a victim of extortion Dutch real estate tycoon, Willem Endstra and an intelligence agent, are not protected by copyright. Beautiful or ugly, good or bad, little effort or years of work, this is all irrelevant in the judgment whether something is copyrighted: Examples of works that may be the subject of tqpes are novels, paintings, software and also television formats, musical improvisations, games and lectures.


Ook moeten deze voorwaarden altijd letterlijk worden vermeld. Bart Beuving over intellectueel eigendom, e-business en IT. It is therefore clear that a large diversity of works in The Netherlands enjoy copyright protection.

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries lexology. Their names are not mentioned in the book. Using an inherently vague definition to establish a clear lower limit of copyright protection requires a lot of creative labour.

Thanks for telling us about the problem.

Endstra’s final work? Dutch copyright: scope of protection remains very wide

As long as there is an original expression this will generally be sufficient. The endztra can therefore not qualify for copyright protection.

Edwin Meijer marked it as to-read May 28, In andthe real estate broker Endstra held fifteen conversations with detectives of the Criminal Intelligence Unit in all secrecy. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Netherlands February 4 Books by Bart Middelburg.

“Backseat conversations” not protected by copyright – Kluwer Copyright Blog

Enfstra rated it it was amazing Oct 12, It is assessed that the requirements applicable to qualify for copyright protection in the Netherlands are low, but not so low that there is no threshold at all. In addition, the intention requirement is not completely logical: Endstra was murdered in May If in the Endstra-tapes sufficiently creative choices were made, these conversations are copyrighted.


On 30 Maythe Supreme Court in The Netherlands decided in a dispute between the sons gapes the real estate broker Endstra and two journalists that for the creation of a copyright work it is not required that the author intended to make a creation. Open Preview See a Problem? After the Amsterdam Court of Appeal had ruled that enndstra backseat conversations could not be protected by copyright, the Dutch Supreme Court concluded that copyright protection was not impossible by definition.

Although Endstra undoubtedly thought about taped he wanted and did not want to release to the detectives and therefore applied a certain selection, he did not intentionally couch his story as a coherent creation and as a result there was no copyright work.

Kristof Langens rated it liked it Jun 09, Hierbij moet altijd Bart Beuving als auteur en de domeinnaam www. Corina added it Oct 05, Although the decision was rendered in the very quiet holiday seasons, the first reactions followed soon.

Both the District Court Amsterdam and the Court of Appeal Amsterdam did not find that these conversations are copyrighted. May 19, Emma rated it did not like it. Priscilla Lukus added it Apr 16, Emdstra Court of Appeal said that if someone does not intend to make a copyright work, no copyright work is created.