Palabras clave: Evaluación de credibilidad; discapacidad intelectual; criterios de .. La prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio. la pericial psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio. En un estudio de archivo, . las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación psicológica que son totalmente. A.L. ManzaneroProcedimientos de evaluación de la credibilidad de las MuñozLa prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio: Reflexiones.

Author: Taunris Shazil
Country: Paraguay
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 10 September 2013
Pages: 475
PDF File Size: 19.34 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.9 Mb
ISBN: 528-9-46084-505-7
Downloads: 15583
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Maujind

Perceived credibility and eyewitness testimony of children with intellectual disabilities. Knowledge of crime context: Law and human behavior, 33 2 Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26 2 None of the phenomenological characteristics studied turned out to be significant for discriminating between actual and simulated victims.

Where were you going? Psychological Review, 84, According to the original proposition, actual statements would contain more contextual and sensory information and show less allusion to cognitive processes and idiosyncratic information than fabricated statements.

Recensión. Evaluación Pericial Psicológica de Credibilidad de Testimonio

The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. RM’s basic assumption is that statements based on memories of actual events are qualitatively different from statements that are not based on experience or are simply the product of fantasy, as Johnson and Raye had shown.

Psychological Review, 88, Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behaviour in children and adults. Then again, the results obtained would be applicable only to those statements originating perixial an actual memory and to false statements generated from information about an event presented schematically.


Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 18 7 Given the bias that may condition our intuitive credibility evaluation in persons with ID, and because such an evaluation carries a significant margin of error, it is absolutely essential that, in a law enforcement or legal setting, individuals who specialize in ID would be on hand when the testimony of a person with ID is to be evaluated.

In addition, those participants who did not go on the day trip were given a summary of the most important information about the trip, such as the location, the trip’s primary complication, and how the day went.

The truth about lies: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: Witness competency in people with mental retardation: Sexuality and Disability, 11, Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load.

Evaluación de la credibilidad de relatos de personas con discapacidad intelectual

Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. In conclusion, in light of our results, we may affirm that there are complexities credibillidad in analyzing the credibility of testimony given by an adult person with ID and, even beyond that, in designing the supportive procedures required to obtain a valid testimony.


Memories of perceptive origin psicoloigca have more contextual and sensory attributes and more semantic details, while self-generated memories would contain more information about cognitive operations.

Of the 15 criteria analyzed, however, there were two amount of detail and length that were significant for discriminating between the two types of statements and, therefore, could be of some help in distinguishing the origin of the statements.

Research in Pericoal Disabilities, 34, Cluster analysis can group cases with a Why do the police interview eyewitnesses? The child sexual abuse accomodation syndrome.

Evaluacion Pericial by Pamela Alvarez on Prezi

Juror’s perception of witnesses with intellectual disabilities and influence of expert evidence. Conclusions As noted in the introduction, there is an abundance of literature that points out inconsistencies in the attributes differentiating true statements from false statements, as well as the irrelevance of RM procedure criteria, on the whole, for distinguishing between true and false statements. From phenotypes to etiologies pp. Verschuere Ed Detecting Deception: Sexual abuse and exploitation of children and adults with mental retardation and dd handicaps.